Google’s Bradley Horowitz recently announced that Google+ will be accepting Nicknames and Pseudonyms. Considering other changes, is Google+ drowning?

People from day one have been asking for anonymity on Google+ and now Google has a few ways to hide your real name from the world. At least that is how it seems. With the announcement a couple of friends tried setting up nicknames. And while they could add them into their profile, they couldn’t change the name that people saw. Hopefully that portion just hasn’t rolled out yet.

The Pseudonym Policy on the other hand will require some verification. The methods could be rather arbitrary as they say the will require either real world or online verification of some sort. The arbitrary nature of the verification process is where I see problems coming in. The other question is what should be a nickname and what a Pseudonym?

Finally, Google is forcing people to sign up for Google+ when they get any of Google’s services. While we all know that this is a sure fire way to artificially increase the numbers for Google+, there is another problem with this. The naming policy, unless you get an approved pseudonym, requires real information such as your full name. This limits the usefulness of Gmail as an anonymous e-mail account. Not only that, but it could drive people to picking up Yahoo or Hotmail accounts again. Forcing people to sign up for a service they don’t want and will not use is a bad business decision on any company’s part. It really makes you wonder if Google+ is drowning in its own hype.

Right now I am taking a wait and see approach. I have a Google+ account already, and I do have a Google+ page set up for SiliconShecky, which eventually I will find a tool that will post my articles to Google+ like I post to twitter automatically. Also check out this article from Ars Technica for more information.

This week there was protesting going on about SOPA and PIPA. The real question is, what happens now?

Congressmen are removing their support. the people who introduced the bills are removing the DNS blocking provisions. What more needs to happen is the question that they will ask.

First, lets start with this, a politicians promise is like a prostitute’s kiss. It is slimy and is not something you can believe. The fact that non of the congressmen who have backpedaled have given any clue as to what they now find objectionable outside of their constituents not liking the bill, is a worrisome sign. One that shows that they don’t really want to back off, and they are putting on a face until the fervor dies down. This is why we need to press the advantage right now to get these bills changed.

Karl W. Palachuk rightly claims in a Facebook post that 99% of the people who signed the petitions don’t know much about the bill. He though, like a lot of the people for the bills, try to make it about infringing versus not infringing. That is not the real problem. People like him who say that not supporting SOPA/PIPA is akin to being a pirate yourself are short sighted and wrong. The real issues are Cybersecurity, letting the foxes (RIAA/MPAA) guard the hen house, and no oversight. The Censorship angel is being used as a way to disguise these other issues that have been brought up.

For instance, there is a provision in SOPA that “bars the distribution of tools and services designed to get around such blacklists.” This is dangerous because sites such as Tor, which is used by people in places such as China and Iran to get around their firewalls, could create problems for VPNs, which could be used by people who work for multinational companies to get around the blacklists, and encryption which would prevent people from seeing what you are requesting on the net. Heck, to bypass some of the blocking/filtering, you could just modify your hosts file. Does that make every operating system illegal under SOPA?

Also think about this. The punishments in SOPA do not fit the crimes. Overbearing on the fines front, making these crimes a felony and setting jail times longer than those who beat up their wives or kids is just not right.

Now to further the argument, there is the Megaupload takedown which happened yesterday. this 2 year investigation with international cooperation sets a standard for taking down sites that are helping pirate stuff knowingly. Yes they have servers on American soil, but they are a multinational company, and Kim Dotcom was arrested in New Zealand. That right there shows that the DCMA combined with current law can take down pirates.

Yes Piracy is a problem. Then again its always been a problem. Should we shut down libraries because people might not (and do not) return books thereby getting them for free. Heck they read them for free through the library. You can get movies, music all of it for free from a library. Why not shut them down? The point being that no matter what, there will be it. I have yet to see confirmable numbers on what it actually is doing to the entertainment industry, but with the amounts of money the execs get pain in bonuses, it really can’t be hurting them too much.

You can go to sites like ArsTechnica.com and find a wealth of information about SOPA and PIPA, what they could do with the laws, extreme examples such as I have posted, and more. There is a wealth of good information out there, and people do need to actually take time to make educated decisions about these sorts of laws.

Finally, think about this. How often do the worst case scenarios come true? Look to the past, see what controversial laws have been enacted without oversight, and how they have been abused over the years. See what groups like the RIAA and MPAA have done in playing the role of Chicken Little (Cassette Tapes, VCRs etc..) over the years, and how they have been proven wrong. We have to decide at some point our own future and not let it get silently dictated to us by a bunch of corporate goons.

People don’t listen. I recently did a little test on my personal Facebook account. I posted a quote from a Republican candidate, said how the quote sounded like Pre-WWII Nazi propaganda and waited. I was not disappointed as people pointed to only part of the statement.

It was an interesting experiment that confirmed what I feared. Most people see and hear only what they want to, and are blind to the rest.  So what does this have to do with the world of IT? Plenty. think about when you deal with a customer/client/user. Do you only hear party of what they are saying,or do you hear the whole thing? Is the client only hearing certain things you are saying? Where is the disconnect and how can one get past it?

Now this disconnect is shown in all its glory with SOPA and PIPA. Congress is listening to the entertainment industry. the refuse to hear what the tech industry has to say. It is a sham that could make us more unsecure. The techniques of domain blocking they are talking about are not only used by oppressive regimes to control what their citizens can see on the Internet, but is used by the very same people that they are trying to stop.

Think about this, you get an e-mail from what looks like a legitimate source, and get sent to a good forgery of the website. The link showed the right address, until you really dig into it. Next thing you know, you have become a victim of identity theft. This is the sort of misdirection that SOPA and PIPA use. Redirecting and falsifying the DNS records. This is what DNS-Sec, which has been years in the making, is supposed to curb or stop.

The RIAA and MPAA, who are so knowledgeable and innovative in the tech world that they are still trying to avoid it, swear that these laws won’t harm security and won’t damage DNS-Sec. Yet the experts who have been DENIED a chance to talk to the committees about the technical issues, are saying the exact opposite. Congress still won’t listen.

Don’t get me wrong, as much as I don’t like the RIAA and MPAA for overextending copyrights so that they don’t have to innovate, they have a right to want help in controlling piracy of their work. To me its not for the Artists who make millions of dollars, but for the lowly engineers, the secretaries, the people who make normal wages and want to keep their jobs. Yes piracy is not as big as it once was, and as more and easier legitimate means come to get entertainment, it goes down. Also, you will never be able to completely stop it. The pirates always find a way around things.

In a world where Identity Theft is a larger problem than Piracy, where something such as DNS-Sec and other security measures that are impacted or killed by bills such as SOPA and PIPA, what is the right solution. SOPA and PIPA definitely are not.  Feel free to e-mail this to your congressmen and senators, for them hearing from us, the people who employ them, is the only way to truly stop it.

Google Plus, the honeymoon is over. Is social Media any good when you have no one to talk to?

So there we go. Google is really bringing the hammer down on people who use Pseudonyms. Not only for Plus, but also for Buzz, and other Googley apps. What good is it though? People get pissed and leave those services. That means less ad money for Google. It gives people a bad taste in their mouth, so they stop purchasing things that Google supports. It can be a nightmare, especially in this day and age of Twitter and Facebook also.

A friend of mine who just left google plus wrote the following as their last post:

Dear +Bradley Horowitz

I really thought you guys had figured it out, but its pretty clear from the Google Name Policy that Google has once again failed at recognizing the basic tenant of social networking, namely that relationships made and maintained online are just as real as those made in real life if not more so because of the greater pool of finding like minded individuals. Clearly those at the top have never been part of a forum community, an MMO, or been to a spontaneous community event whether it be out in the desert at Burning Man, inside the track at the Indy 500, or just waiting in a line for a concert. Those who have understand that a chosen name is just as real as one printed, stamped and filed by someone’s parents.

Everyone else has already mentioned the safety and legal concerns of denying the protection of a pseudonym to a wide array of people who would be in significant danger should they use their legal names on a public, datamining, service, so I won’t belabor the point.

For Google, I only ask you to watch the numbers as people begin to walk away and try to understand the significance of having a network where no one is, because none of their friends can participate safely.

For everyone else, please repost on your own accounts, you can give me a mention, if you like, but don’t just share it, you never know when I won’t be considered ‘real’ enough for Google.

Collapse this post

Last week Facebook announced a new video chat powered by Skype. The question is, what does this mean for privacy?

Facebooks announcement last week of now having the ability to have video chats with friends was a big announcement. It meant that Facebook was doing something other chat systems have had for years. The partnership with Microsoft/Skype (that deal is still pending approval), is logical. The problems that Facebook can face though, have me wary of it.

First off, Facebook doesn’t enforce its own TOS, which has an age limit. We already have heard about cyber bullying cases. The video chat can take this to a new level. What about people pretending to be your children’s age, but really being pedophiles? This now takes on a different issue. There are 2 other things though that bother me about this.

First, encryption of calls. I haven’t had a full chance to play with the system, but nowhere have I seen any mention that the calls will be encrypted. Skype itself uses encryption on the client end, but Skype also is a P2P system, so the encryption happens at a person’s machine. Facebook looks to be a server solution, so are these call being encrypted, or can someone easily look in on them? I know some people are looking into this aspect.

The other troublesome part to me is a patent that Microsoft has from 2009 to silently record calls over a network. With the pending acquisition of Skype, it can be very easy for Microsoft to toss this technology in Skype, and the Facebook chat. think of it, your calls, your video, your “private” conversations, recorded without your consent, without your knowledge, and possibly without a warrant. This is not to say that they will, but the opportunity is there. Not only that, but think of Facebook’s stance on privacy. They have already said that they don’t care about it. People will get used to not having privacy. Imagine the information they can get from your phone calls.

I am not saying that these scenarios will happen, but they are possibilities. Some more likely than others, but they all must be taken into consideration.

A few days ago I wrote about A problem with Add-Ons and Firefox 5, along with no support anymore for Firefox 4. Now Firefox is really trying to commit suicide.

Firefox was a great browser. Yes, I say was, because it won’t last that much longer. Not with the path they have chosen at least. Focusing on the consumer market isn’t a bad thing. You will get people who will use Firefox at home when their corporations don’t allow for its use internally. Actively saying, “We don’t care about corporations,” though is akin to committing suicide.

Mozilla might not care about the corporate environment, but they do need to be aware of it. With hosted apps, and work websites becoming more and more prevalent in the world, to survive on a consumer end, you need to be. Heck, most of the web sites that people visit are done by corporations. Now with the accelerated pace of releases, and no support for the prior release, web designers will need to check more and more versions of Firefox against their websites to make sure that they aren’t broken by the changes. The amount of manpower and time will drive up the cost of web development. Sites will shut down, or the other logical solution will happen.

Sites won’t try to be compatible with Firefox anymore. They just won’t care. Chrome is passing up Firefox in usage, and Internet Explorer still has the majority of market share. Google just needs to support prior versions for a corporate environment, just like Microsoft has already started to jump at companies reminding them they won’t run into a lack of security patches. Heck, IE8 and 9 are pretty good from a security standpoint as it is.

Firefox thinks that doesn’t matter. Consumers will continue to use Firefox. No, they won’t if it doesn’t render web sites properly. The lack of foresight on Mozilla’s part is pretty amazing. First thing taught in retail and marketing is that 1 complaint, 1 problem with a client, can hurt you in a huge way, as they spread the word to avoid such an item.

Six weeks between releases is ambitious, and hurts consumers who’s plug ins and add-ons might now work with the latest version. Can new versions of the plug ins be ready in under the time it takes for the next version to come out? This is the other side of the death spiral Mozilla is putting itself into. Consumers love the plug ins. If they don’t work, what good is Firefox to them anyway?

There is still time for Mozilla to save itself. They have to support a 3 month old browser they put out. They have to show the world that they care about more than their own egos. They have to stop being the poster child for what can be wrong with open source, and get back to showing what is right with it.

Mozzila decided to be aggressive with Firefox releases. Not a problem, just keep the old version till add-ons are all compatible. Doesn’t work that way if you want to be secure.

Mozzila announced that Firefox 5 is the security update for Firefox 4. There will be no other updates unless there is a major, and they mean major, security hole. Fine, I have no issues with doing that, keeping people on the latest version, making sure people know that is the way it is. Except for one thing. Only about 80% of the add-ons out there are going to work on Firefox 5.

The issues I have are now pretty simple, but extremely important. They are also why I think Firefox is trying to push itself to extinction. First, Firefox 5 came out today, same day as the announcement about Firefox 4 security updates. Second, one of the add-ons that don’t work in Firefox 5 is for LogMeInRescue, which I use on a very regular basis. I am now forced to use a different browser for supporting clients, because Mozzila decided that to be secure I had to update and break what I need. Not very smart on Mozzila’s part.

This also leads to another issue. People will stop upgrading, just so their add-ons will work. Of course, if they don’t upgrade, they are open to more security problems. Firefox becomes a security threat due to its aggressive upgrade policy. Someone better explain this to the keepers of Firefox.

Don’t you hate it when you can’t see a website? I know it drove me crazy for a few days. Then I checked my security software settings.

I was trying to check a couple of websites recommended to me out, and couldn’t see them on one of my machines. Laptop was fine, but my desktop would just show a blank page. As the pirate who had a steering wheel attached to him said, “It was driving me nuts.” I knew it was something on the desktop that I had either installed for testing or had set wrong. Turns out I was half right.

I use Kaspersky Internet Security suite on my machines, love it and recommend it to people. Its technology has allowed me to watch it block drive-by download attempts. So I decided a long while ago to tighten the security down on my Desktop. It worked really well, but the banner ad blocker was the thing keeping me from a website run by a marketing company, which had an article I wanted to see. Once I went in and whitelisted the URL, it was fine, but man, what a way to find out something works, and works well.

Firefox 4 is out. For a browser that re-sparked the browser wars, Firefox had been falling behind lately. Can 4 bring back Firefox?

I have a tendency not to download betas of web browsers. I’m not much of a bug hunter, haven’t been able to establish myself in those communities, don’t have a ton of time for actual hard core testing, and I’m not a developer. I just like having things work, especially where web browsing is concerned. So when I heard that Firefox 4′s final release was going to be the exact same as the last Release Candidate, I decided to actually jump the gun and start using it. I figured it couldn’t be any worse than using 3.6.

I’ve been using Firefox as my main browser since version 2, and overall have liked it. There have always been some issues with it, such as the memory hole it has, but they were things I could mostly live with. As  Firefox 3 kept getting updated though, it was all getting worse and worse. To open my iGoogle home page, which is set up with a bunch of news widgets, would take 5 minutes. Not only that, but the whole browser would be slow and unresponsive until it fully opened.

So I finished downloading Firefox 4 and installing it, expecting the same sluggishness. Surprisingly to me, my iGoogle paged opened in under a minute, and I was all set to go to other websites in other tabs, even while the iGoogle page was loading up. This is starting to look promising.

I continued on my browsing way, going to sites I frequent such as Tech Republic, ZDNet, Krebs on Security, and many more. All rendered faster than in Firefox 3.6. I did run into an occasional site which just wouldn’t open in Firefox 4 (Buffalo Wild Wings being one), but considering that there have been a lot of changes in Firefox 4, this doesn’t surprise me.

Everything isn’t all roses though. Java rendering (I enjoy playing Text Twist) and some Flash rendering is slow and painful. The Java being the worst of them all, as it slows to a crawl with a java game on Yahoo’s website. Once loaded, it works ok, but still a bunch of issues. Also, Firefox still uses a lot of memory, and doesn’t have the best memory management in the world. I have also heard reports of people who have had issues with it upon install, although the percentage seems to be small.

Is Firefox 4 an improvement? Definitely. Is it a game changer? No. Can it fend off Google Chrome? Maybe. Personally, I’m not going to Chrome unless I have to (Google has enough info on me from Android, Gmail etc, they don’t get any more if I can help it), and I don’t care of IE, Safari, or Opera. In the end, its really about what you are comfortable with and what works. On that, Firefox 4 is a solid, fast browser.

Viruses are everywhere in this day. They slip past the defenses we put up, mess with our system, and even steal our information. Its a billion dollar black market for some, a set of hi-jinx for others.

For me, its a thorn in my side. 75 to 90 percent of the SMB calls I go on are for removing a virus/trojan from a PC or Laptop. Every time I get asked the same questions. How can we stop this, why did it get through, etc. Unfortunately, I don’t have a good answer for them.

I explain that tis a war. That virus writers are always a step ahead. Antivirus companies have to see the virus so they can stop it, and even that doesn’t always work.

The only way to be safe completely is to not use computers, cell phones, paper, ipads, and anything else that can hold a record. That isn’t going to happen. So I tell them to make sure updates are applied when they come out, and to be on the cautious side concerning web sites. Then a month or two later, I am back out to them removing another virus.