Silicon Shecky

Google’s Bradley Horowitz recently announced that Google+ will be accepting Nicknames and Pseudonyms. Considering other changes, is Google+ drowning?

People from day one have been asking for anonymity on Google+ and now Google has a few ways to hide your real name from the world. At least that is how it seems. With the announcement a couple of friends tried setting up nicknames. And while they could add them into their profile, they couldn’t change the name that people saw. Hopefully that portion just hasn’t rolled out yet.

The Pseudonym Policy on the other hand will require some verification. The methods could be rather arbitrary as they say the will require either real world or online verification of some sort. The arbitrary nature of the verification process is where I see problems coming in. The other question is what should be a nickname and what a Pseudonym?

Finally, Google is forcing people to sign up for Google+ when they get any of Google’s services. While we all know that this is a sure fire way to artificially increase the numbers for Google+, there is another problem with this. The naming policy, unless you get an approved pseudonym, requires real information such as your full name. This limits the usefulness of Gmail as an anonymous e-mail account. Not only that, but it could drive people to picking up Yahoo or Hotmail accounts again. Forcing people to sign up for a service they don’t want and will not use is a bad business decision on any company’s part. It really makes you wonder if Google+ is drowning in its own hype.

Right now I am taking a wait and see approach. I have a Google+ account already, and I do have a Google+ page set up for SiliconShecky, which eventually I will find a tool that will post my articles to Google+ like I post to twitter automatically. Also check out this article from Ars Technica for more information.

Google Plus, the honeymoon is over. Is social Media any good when you have no one to talk to?

So there we go. Google is really bringing the hammer down on people who use Pseudonyms. Not only for Plus, but also for Buzz, and other Googley apps. What good is it though? People get pissed and leave those services. That means less ad money for Google. It gives people a bad taste in their mouth, so they stop purchasing things that Google supports. It can be a nightmare, especially in this day and age of Twitter and Facebook also.

A friend of mine who just left google plus wrote the following as their last post:

Dear +Bradley Horowitz

I really thought you guys had figured it out, but its pretty clear from the Google Name Policy that Google has once again failed at recognizing the basic tenant of social networking, namely that relationships made and maintained online are just as real as those made in real life if not more so because of the greater pool of finding like minded individuals. Clearly those at the top have never been part of a forum community, an MMO, or been to a spontaneous community event whether it be out in the desert at Burning Man, inside the track at the Indy 500, or just waiting in a line for a concert. Those who have understand that a chosen name is just as real as one printed, stamped and filed by someone’s parents.

Everyone else has already mentioned the safety and legal concerns of denying the protection of a pseudonym to a wide array of people who would be in significant danger should they use their legal names on a public, datamining, service, so I won’t belabor the point.

For Google, I only ask you to watch the numbers as people begin to walk away and try to understand the significance of having a network where no one is, because none of their friends can participate safely.

For everyone else, please repost on your own accounts, you can give me a mention, if you like, but don’t just share it, you never know when I won’t be considered ‘real’ enough for Google.

Collapse this post

Google uses the moniker, “Don’t Be Evil,” but is that the truth behind the company? A look at Google Plus might change your mind.

Google+ is an interesting creature. One that is gaining popularity rather quickly. It is also one that might not last due to Google’s own policies.

The buzz around Google wanting people to only use real names in Google+ is gaining more and more steam. People are not happy with this idea. Everyone thought that Google+ would be better than Facebook. It definitely has the potential to compete with Facebook. The naming issue is turning into a stumbling block.

I will not go into depth on the whole idea of hiding from stalkers using a pseudonym in a social media setting. Instead I look at it from a natural way to know people. I have a great deal of online friends. I know them by their names from games, from forums, form other places that you don’t use your normal name. So when I see that Joe Shmo instead of DJ Cool J has added me to their circles, I have to sit back and wonder who the heck is following me? For that matter, Google+ is only as usable as the people you have in your circles, and if I cannot find them easily, which means nicknames, pseudonyms, etc, then I am not going to use the site.

Google though, sees the whole Social Media world as data. Just like search, just like AdWords, it is all data that can be used with algorithms to extract bits of information. That information can then be used to send targeted advertising to you. This increases the chance that Google and the company who is advertising can make some money off you. Its all about making a buck.

So should it surprise anyone that Google wants to mine what you say in Google+. What you Link to? Who you are? The amount of data that Google can dig up on each one of us through public means can really give a good profile of us. That can be used for Advertising, or worse, should Google decide to use it for “Homeland Security” purposes.

The book In The Plex by Steven Levey takes a good look at Google. Brin and Page (Google’s Founders) are all about the data and search. Data especially, because they want to have everything in the world indexed in one spot. Just imagine if that data fell into the wrong hands.