Skip to content
Silicon Shecky

Silicon Shecky

Infosec Practitioner

  • New Year, New Post, from the start General
  • First Defcon – The results Reviews
  • Defender, KQL and Lockbit Microsoft
  • Do well, not be “popular” Ramblings
  • Defense Layers: A Case Study Microsoft
  • Device vs. User Microsoft
  • Ransomware, Are You Ready? General
  • Gatekeeping and Treatment of Others Rants

The OS future

Posted on September 14, 2011 By Michael Kavka No Comments on The OS future

Windows 8 has been unveiled, OSx is Roaring, and Ubuntu is trying to create a Unity. These new OS’s give us a peek at the future, but what does it really say?

Over on ZDNet Ed Bott wrote a nice article on Windows 8. I’m not going to go into it in detail, but the Article and the screen shots got me to thinking, what is the future of the Operating Systems in general? Ubuntu and Windows have come up with new GUIs, and they are different. Geared toward simplifying navigation, are these becoming too simple? Are we getting to the point of making something that a fool can use, and only a fool will use it?

I am not against change, as long as there is a good reason for it. Making a GUI more user friendly is not a bad thing. The big problems I have with the way Ubuntu, and now Windows are going about it though worries me from a support standpoint. How much more difficult is it becoming to find the deep areas that those of us who do troubleshoot machines use? How much more training will we need? How will this affect how people use the OS in a business environment?

The OS that has changed the least in GUI appearance over the years is Macintosh. The basic layout, and where you find things has been essentially the same going back to its beginning, with just some upgrades to that classic look and feel. Apple boasts about how easy it is to use a Mac, and from an OS standpoint, they are right. You don’t have to learn a new GUI with every update. You have your bar up top which allows for the classic drop down menus. They added the dock at the bottom, but you don’t have to use it.

Unity, the new look kills off the classic menu structures to get at your programs. It takes more clicks to find something that is not docked. The more elegant look actually becomes more complex. When you log into the OS, you can choose to go back to the Classic look, but it is not prevalent on how to, although it is simple if you know where to look. Still, the more complex sets of clicks to find an installed program can be a big hindrance to acceptance. Also realize the look doesn’t add anything to security.

Windows 8 poses a bigger question. With it being meant for touch screen, although you can use a mouse and keyboard, and the look and feel being more toward Microsoft’s phone OS, how is this going to complicate finding files, finding software you install? The desktop space is a premium but, as we all know, you put too much there it becomes hard to find what you are looking for. Also what about software that is not on the desktop? How about file exploring especially if you are on a network where items are kept on multiple network drives?

These questions, and where the companies want to steer the computing world are really what will shape the future, and also cause problems. Too much change at once is not good, and change for its own sake usually causes more problems than its worth. Only time will tell what the answers are but, from first glance, it seems as if making the look the same across all platforms is happening, and from there, maybe you get into a situation like Chrome OS, where it is basically a browser, and nothing is kept locally. If that is the case, you can port your GUI look across multiple devices easy, but then who owns your information since it will not be stored locally? Its something to think about.

Apple, Computers, Linux, Microsoft, Software Tags:Apple, Linux, Microsoft, Operating Systems, OS, OSx, Ubuntu, Windows 8

Post navigation

Previous Post: Shecky Tweets for 2011-09-14
Next Post: Shecky Tweets for 2011-09-15

Related Posts

  • Defender, KQL and Lockbit Microsoft
  • Defense Layers: A Case Study Microsoft
  • Device vs. User Microsoft
  • The one about banking passwords… Rants
  • Zoom Zoom or WTF people? Rants
  • Over Complicated? Hardware

More Related Articles

Defender, KQL and Lockbit Microsoft
Defense Layers: A Case Study Microsoft
Device vs. User Microsoft
The one about banking passwords… Rants
Zoom Zoom or WTF people? Rants
Over Complicated? Hardware

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • About
  • Links
    • Burbsec
    • BSides312
    • Infosec Exchange Mastodon
    • BSidesRoc
    • Hacks4Pancakes Blog
    • Krebs On Security
    • Bleeping Computer
  • Categories
    • General
    • Computers
    • Software
    • Rants
    • Security
    • Internet/Music
    • Reviews
    • Microsoft
    • Hardware
    • Mobile Computing
  • Archives
  • Social Media

Browse by tags

Active Directory Android Antivirus Apple Beta Chrome Computers Exchange Exchange 2007 Firefox General Thoughts Google InfoSec Internet Explorer iOS iPad IT Linux Mac Malware Microsoft OS OSx Patches Rants SBS SBS 2008 Security Security Patches Server SMB Software Support Surface TechEd Tweets Ubuntu Verizon Virus Vista vulnerabilities Windows Windows 7 Windows 8 XP

RSS Taggart Institute Intel Feed

  • New Year, New Post, from the start General
  • First Defcon – The results Reviews
  • Defender, KQL and Lockbit Microsoft
  • Do well, not be “popular” Ramblings
  • Defense Layers: A Case Study Microsoft
  • Device vs. User Microsoft
  • Ransomware, Are You Ready? General
  • Gatekeeping and Treatment of Others Rants

Social Media

  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2026 Silicon Shecky.